![]() ![]() the points awarded should be a reflection of the time and effort needed to reach a tier and the players buy in. If they look at the average sit and go play time and multiply that number by the max points awarded for that SnG it will tell them approximately the MINIMUM amout of playtime required to reach a tier with thier change if a player plays just one table at a time. :\ awhile ago GOP3 doubled the buy in's for the two biggest SnG's and for a momment people were expected to win ( best case senario) 42 1st place wins for 240 points to reach 10k if they only play the Crown, without receiving any double points lol :\ ![]() 240 points for winning the table was a joke if not an insult and unfair. I dont think GOP3 considered how much time it would take the dedicated players to finish thier personal challenge of 10k even if they only played the Crown. then guesstimate how much game time it would take the average player to reach each reward tier if they only played that one SnG and make it fair and reasonably attainable. They need to know the average time it take for someone to win a sit and go, the average time spent playing daily by the average player. I really hope that GOP3 does some basic math before trying this new system out again.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |